[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220311161406.23497-5-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 17:14:04 +0100
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, parth@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: qais.yousef@....com, chris.hyser@...cle.com,
pkondeti@...eaurora.org, valentin.schneider@....com,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, David.Laight@...lab.com,
pjt@...gle.com, pavel@....cz, tj@...nel.org,
dhaval.giani@...cle.com, qperret@...gle.com,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] sched/core: Add permission checks for setting the latency_nice value
From: Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>
Since the latency_nice uses the similar infrastructure as NICE, use the
already existing CAP_SYS_NICE security checks for the latency_nice. This
should return -EPERM for the non-root user when trying to set the task
latency_nice value to any lower than the current value.
Signed-off-by: Parth Shah <parth@...ux.ibm.com>
[rebase]
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3edba1a38ecb..8f8b102a75c4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7360,6 +7360,10 @@ static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
return -EINVAL;
if (attr->sched_latency_nice < MIN_LATENCY_NICE)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Use the same security checks as NICE */
+ if (attr->sched_latency_nice < p->latency_nice &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE))
+ return -EPERM;
}
if (pi)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists