[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yit/1Ba5IIHl8eKt@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:59:00 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/unwind/orc: delete dead write in __orc_find()
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:13:02PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Alexey Dobriyan
> > Sent: 11 March 2022 14:43
> >
> > Also move "mid" variable to the innermost scope and delete useless
> > parenthesis while I'm at it.
>
> Hiding the definition of 'mid' in the inner scope is pointless.
Not, it is not.
> I'm also not 100% sure that 'found' is always set.
"found" is left as-is by the patch.
> Consider the ip < orc_ip(first) case.
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_orc.c
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct orc_entry *__orc_find(int *ip_table, struct orc_entry *u_table,
> > {
> > int *first = ip_table;
> > int *last = ip_table + num_entries - 1;
> > - int *mid = first, *found = first;
> > + int *found = first;
> >
> > if (!num_entries)
> > return NULL;
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static struct orc_entry *__orc_find(int *ip_table, struct orc_entry *u_table,
> > * ignored when they conflict with a real entry.
> > */
> > while (first <= last) {
> > - mid = first + ((last - first) / 2);
> > + int *mid = first + (last - first) / 2;
> >
> > if (orc_ip(mid) <= ip) {
> > found = mid;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists