linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Convert Qcom CPUFREQ HW binding to YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220311033101.p5n3a5ik5i4nzrc6@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 09:01:01 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     rafael@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Convert Qcom CPUFREQ HW binding to YAML

On 09-03-22, 20:45, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Patch 2/2 was submitted separately [1] but Rob's bot reported errors related to
> the performance domain binding that used Qcom CPUFREQ as an example. But Qcom
> CPUFREQ driver doesn't support the generic performance domains yet.
> 
> So I've added a patch 1/2 that fixes the warning by using MediaTek CPUFREQ as
> the example and added both patches to this series.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20211005044920.78544-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org/
> 
> Changes in v2:
> 
> * Moved dvfs binding patch to 1/2 for avoiding DT Bot error.
> * Added Krzysztof to "To" list.

Applied. Thanks.

-- 
viresh