linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Replace ppc64 DT_RELACOUNT usage with DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87a6dxm8e8.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:15:59 +1100
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Replace ppc64 DT_RELACOUNT usage with
 DT_RELASZ/24

Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:48 AM Nick Desaulniers
> <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:53 PM Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > DT_RELACOUNT is an ELF dynamic tag inherited from SunOS indicating the
>> > number of R_*_RELATIVE relocations. It is optional but {ld.lld,ld.lld}
>> > -z combreloc always creates it (if non-zero) to slightly speed up glibc
>> > ld.so relocation resolving by avoiding R_*R_PPC64_RELATIVE type
>> > comparison. The tag is otherwise nearly unused in the wild and I'd
>> > recommend that software avoids using it.
>> >
>> > lld>=14.0.0 (since commit da0e5b885b25cf4ded0fa89b965dc6979ac02ca9)
>> > underestimates DT_RELACOUNT for ppc64 when position-independent long
>> > branch thunks are used. Correcting it needs non-trivial arch-specific
>> > complexity which I'd prefer to avoid. Since our code always compares the
>> > relocation type with R_PPC64_RELATIVE, replacing every occurrence of
>> > DT_RELACOUNT with DT_RELASZ/sizeof(Elf64_Rela)=DT_RELASZ/24 is a correct
>> > alternative.
>>
>> checking that sizeof(Elf64_Rela) == 24, yep: https://godbolt.org/z/bb4aKbo5T
>>
>> >
>> > DT_RELASZ is in practice bounded by an uint32_t. Dividing x by 24 can be
>> > implemented as (uint32_t)(x*0xaaaaaaab) >> 4.
>>
>> Yep: https://godbolt.org/z/x9445ePPv
>>
>> >
>> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1581
>> > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
>> > ---
>> >  arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.S       | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
>> >  arch/powerpc/kernel/reloc_64.S | 15 +++++++++------
>> >  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
...

> I rebased the patch on
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
> master and got a conflict.
> Seems that https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20220309061822.168173-1-aik@ozlabs.ru/T/#u
> ("[PATCH kernel v4] powerpc/64: Add UADDR64 relocation support") fixed
> the issue.
> It just doesn't change arch/powerpc/boot/crt0.S

Yeah sorry, I applied Alexey's v4 just before I saw your patch arrive on
the list.

If one of you can rework this so it applies on top that would be great :)

cheers