linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] erofs: clean up z_erofs_extent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220311154816.00004d23.zbestahu@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:48:16 +0800
From:   Yue Hu <zbestahu@...il.com>
To:     Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        huyue2@...lpad.com, zhangwen@...lpad.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] erofs: clean up z_erofs_extent_lookback

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:39:00 +0800
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:28:28PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 03:12:32PM +0800, Yue Hu wrote:  
> > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:27:42 +0800
> > > Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Avoid the unnecessary tail recursion since it can be converted into
> > > > a loop directly in order to prevent potential stack overflow.
> > > > 
> > > > It's a pretty straightforward conversion.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  fs/erofs/zmap.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/erofs/zmap.c b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
> > > > index b4059b9c3bac..572f0b8151ba 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/erofs/zmap.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/erofs/zmap.c
> > > > @@ -431,48 +431,47 @@ static int z_erofs_extent_lookback(struct z_erofs_maprecorder *m,
> > > >  				   unsigned int lookback_distance)
> > > >  {
> > > >  	struct erofs_inode *const vi = EROFS_I(m->inode);
> > > > -	struct erofs_map_blocks *const map = m->map;
> > > >  	const unsigned int lclusterbits = vi->z_logical_clusterbits;
> > > > -	unsigned long lcn = m->lcn;
> > > > -	int err;
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (lcn < lookback_distance) {
> > > > -		erofs_err(m->inode->i_sb,
> > > > -			  "bogus lookback distance @ nid %llu", vi->nid);
> > > > -		DBG_BUGON(1);
> > > > -		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
> > > > -	}
> > > > +	while (m->lcn >= lookback_distance) {
> > > > +		unsigned long lcn = m->lcn - lookback_distance;
> > > > +		int err;  
> > > 
> > > may better to declare variable 'lclusterbits' in loop just like 'err' usage?  
> > 
> > I'm fine with either way. Ok, will post the next version later.  
> 
> Oh, I just noticed that you mean `lclusterbits', I think it won't
> change in this function, so I don't tend to move it into the inner
> loop.

Ok, looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@...lpad.com>

> 
> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Gao Xiang