[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8b2deefd-032d-65f0-cebb-d18cc11faf5a@canonical.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 11:20:04 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To: nick.hawkins@....com, verdun@....com
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] dt-bindings: arm: Add HPE GXP Binding
On 10/03/2022 20:52, nick.hawkins@....com wrote:
> From: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@....com>
>
> This adds support for the hpe,gxp binding. The GXP is based on
> the cortex a9 processor and supports arm7.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@....com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/gxp.yaml | 53 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gxp.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gxp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gxp.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..edfd331c493e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gxp.yaml
Missing vendor prefix in file name, so "hpe,gxp.yaml"
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/gxp.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: HPE bmc GXP SoC driver
Driver does not fit here. I think you are adding HPE GXP platforms? If yes
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nick Hawkins <nick.hawkins@....com>
> + - Jean-Marie Verdun <verdun@....com>
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: hpe,gxp
This is not proper SoC/boards description. Look at intel,keembay.yaml
for example.
You also miss here other compatibles - for board(s).
> +
> + "#address-cells":
> + const: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> +
> +additionalProperties: true
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
Skip the example, platform bindings do not have them.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists