lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yisxg3izMrGVahOQ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 12:24:51 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: topology: make cache topology separate from cpu
 topology

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 04:58:44AM -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
> 
> Some architectures(e.g. ARM64), caches are implemented below:
> cluster:              ****** cluster 0 *****      ****** cluster 1 *****
> core:                 0      1      2      3      4      5      6      7
> cache(Leveln):        **cache0**   **cache1**	 **cache2**   **cache3**
> sd_llc_id(current):   0      0      0      0      4      4      4      4
> sd_llc_id(should be): 0      0      2      2      4      4      6      6
> 
> Caches and cpus have different topology, this causes cpus_share_cache()
> return the wrong value, which will affect the CPU load balance.
> 
> Cache topology should be separated with CPU topology, it can be obtained
> from "next-level-cache" in DTS preferentially.

If your clusters do not have cache, then you're currently setting
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES wrong, if they do, things are correct.

If you want to represent L2, use the new fangled cluster level or
something, that's what it's there for.

That is, you can represent the above like:

	DIE:	0-7
	MC:	0-3,		4-7
	CLS:	0-1,1-2,	4-5,6-7

But if there is cache at MC, LLC is what it is.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ