[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tencent_B5D64530EB9C7DBB8D2C88A0C790F1489D0A@qq.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:07:16 +0800
From: Weiguo Li <liwg06@...mail.com>
To: dave@...olabs.net, dbueso@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf bench: Fix null check
We did a null check after "epollfdp = calloc(...)", but we checked
"epollfd" instead of "epollfdp".
Signed-off-by: Weiguo Li <liwg06@...mail.com>
---
tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c b/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c
index 740ae764537e..134612bde0cb 100644
--- a/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c
+++ b/tools/perf/bench/epoll-ctl.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void nest_epollfd(void)
printinfo("Nesting level(s): %d\n", nested);
epollfdp = calloc(nested, sizeof(int));
- if (!epollfd)
+ if (!epollfdp)
err(EXIT_FAILURE, "calloc");
for (i = 0; i < nested; i++) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists