[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YiqxtIz+T1LGE1Ju@google.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 02:19:32 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
David Dunn <daviddunn@...gle.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] KVM: x86: Add a cap to disable NX hugepages on a VM
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, Ben Gardon wrote:
> Those patches are a lot of churn, but at least to me, they make the
> code much more readable. Currently there are many functions which just
> pass along 0 for the memslot, and often have multiple other numerical
> arguments, which makes it hard to understand what the function is
> doing.
Yeah, my solution for that was to rip out all the params. E.g. the most used
function I ended up with is
static inline struct kvm_vm *vm_create_with_one_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu,
void *guest_code)
{
return __vm_create_with_one_vcpu(vcpu, 0, guest_code);
}
and then the usage is
vm = vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_main);
supp_cpuid = kvm_get_supported_cpuid();
cpuid2 = vcpu_get_cpuid(vcpu);
My overarching complaint with the selftests is that they make the hard things hard,
and the easy things harder. If a test wants to be backed by hugepages, it shouldn't
have to manually specify a memslot.
Let me post my selftests rework as RFC (_very_ RFC at this point). I was hoping to
do more than compile test before posting anything, but it's going to be multiple
weeks before I'll get back to it. Hopefully it'll start a discussion on actually
rewriting the framework so that writing new tests is less painful, and so that every
new thing that comes along doesn't require poking at 50 different tests.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists