lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 12 Mar 2022 15:00:40 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: make option lists subsection of "Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree" in stable-kernel-rules.rst

The table of contents generated for stable-kernel-rules.rst contains
"For all other submissions..." section, that includes options
subsections. These options subsections should have been subsections of
"Procedure for submitting patches..." section. Remove the redundant
section.

Also, convert note about security patches to use `.. note::` block.

Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
---
 Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
index 003c865e9c2..d8ce4c0c775 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst
@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@ Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
 Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree
 ----------------------------------------------------
 
- - Security patches should not be handled (solely) by the -stable review
+.. note::
+
+   Security patches should not be handled (solely) by the -stable review
    process but should follow the procedures in
    :ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst <securitybugs>`.
 
-For all other submissions, choose one of the following procedures
------------------------------------------------------------------
+There are three options:
 
 .. _option_1:
 
-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ