[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <760e1916-09cf-11ec-122f-d30e339dca0d@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 11:23:42 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: acpi_pm: fix return value of __setup handler
On 3/11/22 23:09, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 08:03:01PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> __setup() handlers should return 1 to obsolete_checksetup() in
>> init/main.c to indicate that the boot option has been handled.
>> A return of 0 causes the boot option/value to be listed as an Unknown
>> kernel parameter and added to init's (limited) environment strings.
>>
>> The __setup() handler interface isn't meant to handle negative return
>> values -- they are non-zero, so they mean "handled" (like a return
>> value of 1 does), but that's just a quirk. So return 1 from
>> parse_pmtmr(). Also print a warning message if kstrtouint() returns
>> an error.
>>
>> Fixes: 60e3bf14d4e2 ("clocksource: clean up parse_pmtmr()")
>
> I was wondering why I was CC'd on this.
>
> This fixes tag is wrong... My patch just cleaned up the function.
> The original code returned negative error codes already.
OK, thanks for the info.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists