[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <11fa30cb-9b56-ab8c-1352-279052945432@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 22:50:37 +0300
From: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>
To: trix@...hat.com, mchehab@...nel.org, hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl,
cai.huoqing@...ux.dev, xose.vazquez@...il.com
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: stkwebcam: move stk_camera_read_reg() scratch
buffer to struct stk_camera
Hi Trix,
On 3/12/22 20:30, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> In stk_camera_read_reg() a single byte buffer is alloc-ed and
> freed on every function call. Since the size is known,
> move the buffer to the struct stk_camera where it will be alloc-ed
> and freed once.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c | 11 ++---------
> drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c b/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c
> index 5b822214ccc5c..787edb3d47c23 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/stkwebcam/stk-webcam.c
> @@ -150,25 +150,18 @@ int stk_camera_write_reg(struct stk_camera *dev, u16 index, u8 value)
> int stk_camera_read_reg(struct stk_camera *dev, u16 index, u8 *value)
> {
> struct usb_device *udev = dev->udev;
> - unsigned char *buf;
> int ret;
>
> - buf = kmalloc(sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!buf)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> ret = usb_control_msg(udev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(udev, 0),
> 0x00,
> USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE,
> 0x00,
> index,
> - buf,
> + &dev->read_reg_scratch,
> sizeof(u8),
> 500);
Wouldn't it be better to move to modern USB API like usb_control_msg_recv()?
This API does not require buffer to be allocated via kmalloc(), so you
will be able to use value directly.
With regards,
Pavel Skripkin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists