[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yiz98wP1hiPR5Azm@sol.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 12:09:23 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] random: make consistent usage of crng_ready()
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 11:25:17AM -0700, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
> index 69591d599338..e37ae7ef039c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/random.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/random.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static void try_to_generate_entropy(void);
> */
> int wait_for_random_bytes(void)
> {
> - if (likely(crng_ready()))
> + if (crng_ready())
> return 0;
>
> do {
...
> } while (!crng_ready());
I guess the reason why the above doesn't simply use a 'while' loop is because
someone wanted 'likely()' on the first crng_ready()? That doesn't actually
apply, since crng_ready() has likely() itself, it should just be a 'while' loop.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists