linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: COMMON_CLK_LAN966X should depend on SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Mar 2022 19:28:36 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: COMMON_CLK_LAN966X should depend on SOC_LAN966

Quoting Geert Uytterhoeven (2022-02-24 07:29:17)
> The LAN966x Generic Clock Controller is only present on Microchip
> LAN966x SoCs.  Hence add a dependency on SOC_LAN966, to prevent asking
> the user about this driver when configuring a kernel without LAN966x SoC
> support.
> 
> Fixes: 54104ee023333e3b ("clk: lan966x: Add lan966x SoC clock driver")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---

Applied to clk-next