lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9twQe2S11C+kLBLbqt1aabnu8x79BZugRnjg6aN4NBvw-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 12 Mar 2022 17:46:18 +1000
From:   Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes for 5.17-rc8/final

On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 17:51, Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@...mhuis.info> wrote:
>
> On 11.03.22 06:15, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > As expected at this stage its pretty quiet, one sun4i mixer fix and
> > one i915 display flicker fix.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dave.
> >
> > drm-fixes-2022-03-11:
> > drm fixes for v5.17-rc8/final
> >
> > i915:
> > - psr fix screen flicker
> >
> > sun4i:
> > - mixer format fix.
> > The following changes since commit ffb217a13a2eaf6d5bd974fc83036a53ca69f1e2:
> > [...]
>
> Out of curiosity: I might be missing something, but why wasn't the
> (afaics simple) fix for a build problem caused by 9d6366e743f3 ("drm:
> fb_helper: improve CONFIG_FB dependency") (merged for v5.16-rc1) not
> among these fixes? I mean this one:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220203093922.20754-1-tzimmermann@suse.de/
>
> It's sitting in next for a few days already:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=master&id=eea89dff4c39a106f98d1cb5e4d626f8c63908b9
>
> I already asked a few days ago why this fix was not on track for merging
> in this cycle, but I didn't get an answer:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/782a683e-c625-8e68-899b-ce56939afece@leemhuis.info/
>
> Fun fact: It seems the problem and at a rough fix were already kinda
> known mid November when 9d6366e743f3 was still in next:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117062704.14671-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/
>
> Then the issue was reported again two times in February:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/CA+G9fYvN0NyaVkRQmA1O6rX7H8PPaZrUAD7=RDy33QY9rUU-9g@mail.gmail.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YhofdlzadzRmy7tj@debian/
>
> And the fix is relative simple, that's why I wonder why merging is
> delayed. What am I missing?

My radar just missed it, though someone else should have realised it
was necessary on fixes earlier, it also had incorrect Fixes: tagging,
so I fixed that and sent it to Linus,

Thanks,
Dave.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ