[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1d2931e80c03f4d3f7263beaf8f19a4867e9fe32.1647212431.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 16:01:26 -0700
From: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpftool: Add SPDX identifier to btf-dump-file output
A concern about potential GPL violations came up at the new $DAYJOB when
I tried to vendor the vmlinux.h output. The central point was that the
generated vmlinux.h does not embed a license string -- making the
licensing of the file non-obvious.
This commit adds a LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause SPDX license identifier to
the generated vmlinux.h output. This is line with what bpftool generates
in object file skeletons.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
---
tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
index a2c665beda87..fca810a27768 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/btf.c
@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ static int dump_btf_c(const struct btf *btf,
if (err)
return err;
+ printf("/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */\n\n");
printf("#ifndef __VMLINUX_H__\n");
printf("#define __VMLINUX_H__\n");
printf("\n");
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists