linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] include/pipe_fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 13 Mar 2022 07:45:14 +0100
From:   Max Kellermann <max@...rg.de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] include/pipe_fs_i.h: add missing #includes

On 2022/03/13 02:49, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> TBH, I'd rather avoid breeding chain includes; sure, mutex.h and wait.h
> are extremely common anyway.  Oh, well....

In my usual coding style, I expect I can include any header and it
will bring its whole dependency chain (which should be as small as
possible, but not smaller).  This seems cleaner to me, because .c
files need to have no insight what a .h file needs (even if the
dependencies are "extremely common").

If the kernel coding style does not consider this useful, we can of
course easily drop that patch.