linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/30] 4.19.235-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 14:14:41 +0000
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com,
        "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/30] 4.19.235-rc1 review


On 14/03/2022 14:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:58:12PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On 14/03/2022 11:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.235 release.
>>> There are 30 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Wed, 16 Mar 2022 11:27:22 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>> 	https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fpub%2Flinux%2Fkernel%2Fv4.x%2Fstable-review%2Fpatch-4.19.235-rc1.gz&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cjonathanh%40nvidia.com%7C31eb601c0fb5484081d008da05c3aaad%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637828635201758957%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=qkVZnVBxsP8BHFANdvt6NDk8btMPekZoMolKI%2FHK1Zw%3D&amp;reserved=0
>>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.19.y
>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>> -------------
>>> Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>>>       KVM: arm64: Reset PMC_EL0 to avoid a panic() on systems with no PMU
>>
>>
>> The above is causing the following build error for ARM64 ...
>>
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c: In function ‘reset_pmcr’:
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c:624:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘vcpu_sys_reg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>     vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = 0;
>>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c:624:32: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment
>>     vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) = 0;
>>
> 
> Is this also broken in Linus's tree?


No, Linus' tree is not broken. However, I don't see this change in 
Linus' tree (v5.17-rc8).

Jon

-- 
nvpublic