[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yi9nMDGQGKIr8Wms@slm.duckdns.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 06:02:56 -1000
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Cai Huoqing <caihuoqing@...du.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux/kthread.h: remove unused macros
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:53:42PM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> Ever since these macros were introduced in commit b56c0d8937e6
> ("kthread: implement kthread_worker"), there has been precisely one
> user (commit 4d115420707a, "NVMe: Async IO queue deletion"), and that
> user went away in 2016 with db3cbfff5bcc ("NVMe: IO queue deletion
> re-write").
>
> Apart from being unused, these macros are also awkward to use (which
> may contribute to them not being used): Having a way to statically (or
> on-stack) allocating the storage for the struct kthread_worker itself
> doesn't help much, since obviously one needs to have some code for
> actually _spawning_ the worker thread, which must have error
> checking. And these days we have the kthread_create_worker() interface
> which both allocates the struct kthread_worker and spawns the kthread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists