| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ba2c49da-22c5-06ea-e953-82211b953ca8@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 18:24:19 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sesse@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf intel-pt: Synthesize cycle events
On 11/03/2022 19:42, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 11:10:30AM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> @@ -1633,7 +1639,7 @@ static int intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
>>> else
>>> sample.period = ptq->state->tot_insn_cnt - ptq->last_insn_cnt;
>>>
>>> - if (ptq->sample_ipc)
>>> + if (ptq->sample_ipc || pt->sample_cycles)
>> This is not quite right. ptq->sample_ipc is set to indicate when the
>> cycle count is accurate for the current instruction. It can be weakened
>> by using "Approx IPC" which was introduced for dlfilter-show-cycles.
>> Probably that approach should be followed for a "cycles" event also.
>
> Thanks for the review!
>
> I'm not sure if I understand this entirely. The point of the code here
> is to get sample.cyc_cnt computed, even if we're not sampling IPC.
> I've seen the approx IPC code, but I'm not entirely sure how it
> interacts with this?
>
>>> sample.cyc_cnt = ptq->ipc_cyc_cnt - ptq->last_in_cyc_cnt;
>>> if (sample.cyc_cnt) {
>>> sample.insn_cnt = ptq->ipc_insn_cnt - ptq->last_in_insn_cnt;
>>> @@ -1643,8 +1649,30 @@ static int intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
>>>
>>> ptq->last_insn_cnt = ptq->state->tot_insn_cnt;
>> There are variables here that are specific to the "instructions" event, so
>> mixing "cycles" with "instructions" means duplicating those, however maybe
>> it would be better not to allow "y" and "i" options at the same time?
>
> Given that a decode can easily take an hour, it would be really nice to
> be able to keep y and i at the same time :-) (A long-standing pet peeve
> of mine in perf is that you can't show two events side-by-side;
> oprofile did that back in the day, at least on annotations.)
>
> What specifically do you mean by duplicating? That we need to calculate
> them twice in a way I don't do in my current patch, or something else?
> It feels like I'm missing some context here.
>
>>> - return intel_pt_deliver_synth_event(pt, event, &sample,
>>> - pt->instructions_sample_type);
>>> + if (pt->sample_instructions) {
>>> + err = intel_pt_deliver_synth_event(pt, event, &sample,
>>> + pt->instructions_sample_type);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * NOTE: If not doing sampling (e.g. itrace=y0us), we will in practice
>>> + * only see cycles being attributed to branches, since CYC packets
>>> + * only are emitted together with other packets are emitted.
>>> + * We should perhaps consider spreading it out over everything since
>>> + * the last CYC packet, ie., since last time sample.cyc_cnt was nonzero.
>>> + */
>>> + if (pt->sample_cycles && sample.cyc_cnt) {
>>> + sample.id = ptq->pt->cycles_id;
>>> + sample.stream_id = ptq->pt->cycles_id;
>> A "cycles" sample needs to set the sample period to the number of cycles since the
>> last "cycles" sample.
>
> OK. If I understand you right, is this as simple as sample.period =
> sample.cyc_cnt?
>
> /* Steinar */
Perhaps changing it something like below. What do you think?
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
index 062cd25f7cd7..cec0444277f6 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/intel-pt.c
@@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ struct intel_pt_queue {
u64 ipc_cyc_cnt;
u64 last_in_insn_cnt;
u64 last_in_cyc_cnt;
+ u64 last_cy_insn_cnt;
+ u64 last_cy_cyc_cnt;
u64 last_br_insn_cnt;
u64 last_br_cyc_cnt;
unsigned int cbr_seen;
@@ -1666,12 +1668,11 @@ static void intel_pt_prep_sample(struct intel_pt *pt,
}
}
-static int intel_pt_synth_instruction_or_cycle_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
+static int intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
{
struct intel_pt *pt = ptq->pt;
union perf_event *event = ptq->event_buf;
struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, };
- int err;
if (intel_pt_skip_event(pt))
return 0;
@@ -1685,7 +1686,7 @@ static int intel_pt_synth_instruction_or_cycle_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq
else
sample.period = ptq->state->tot_insn_cnt - ptq->last_insn_cnt;
- if (ptq->sample_ipc || pt->sample_cycles)
+ if (ptq->sample_ipc)
sample.cyc_cnt = ptq->ipc_cyc_cnt - ptq->last_in_cyc_cnt;
if (sample.cyc_cnt) {
sample.insn_cnt = ptq->ipc_insn_cnt - ptq->last_in_insn_cnt;
@@ -1695,30 +1696,40 @@ static int intel_pt_synth_instruction_or_cycle_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq
ptq->last_insn_cnt = ptq->state->tot_insn_cnt;
- if (pt->sample_instructions) {
- err = intel_pt_deliver_synth_event(pt, event, &sample,
- pt->instructions_sample_type);
- if (err)
- return err;
- }
+ return intel_pt_deliver_synth_event(pt, event, &sample,
+ pt->instructions_sample_type);
+}
- /*
- * NOTE: If not doing sampling (e.g. itrace=y0us), we will in practice
- * only see cycles being attributed to branches, since CYC packets
- * only are emitted together with other packets are emitted.
- * We should perhaps consider spreading it out over everything since
- * the last CYC packet, ie., since last time sample.cyc_cnt was nonzero.
- */
- if (pt->sample_cycles && sample.cyc_cnt) {
- sample.id = ptq->pt->cycles_id;
- sample.stream_id = ptq->pt->cycles_id;
- err = intel_pt_deliver_synth_event(pt, event, &sample,
- pt->cycles_sample_type);
- if (err)
- return err;
+static int intel_pt_synth_cycle_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
+{
+ struct intel_pt *pt = ptq->pt;
+ union perf_event *event = ptq->event_buf;
+ struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, };
+ u64 period;
+
+ if (pt->synth_opts.quick)
+ period = 1;
+ else
+ period = ptq->ipc_cyc_cnt - ptq->last_cy_cyc_cnt;
+
+ if (!period || intel_pt_skip_event(pt))
+ return 0;
+
+ intel_pt_prep_sample(pt, ptq, event, &sample);
+
+ sample.id = ptq->pt->cycles_id;
+ sample.stream_id = ptq->pt->cycles_id;
+ sample.period = period;
+
+ if (ptq->sample_ipc)
+ sample.cyc_cnt = sample.period;
+ if (sample.cyc_cnt) {
+ sample.insn_cnt = ptq->ipc_insn_cnt - ptq->last_cy_insn_cnt;
+ ptq->last_cy_insn_cnt = ptq->ipc_insn_cnt;
+ ptq->last_cy_cyc_cnt = ptq->ipc_cyc_cnt;
}
- return 0;
+ return intel_pt_deliver_synth_event(pt, event, &sample, pt->cycles_sample_type);
}
static int intel_pt_synth_transaction_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
@@ -2457,11 +2468,17 @@ static int intel_pt_sample(struct intel_pt_queue *ptq)
}
}
- if ((pt->sample_instructions || pt->sample_cycles) &&
- (state->type & INTEL_PT_INSTRUCTION)) {
- err = intel_pt_synth_instruction_or_cycle_sample(ptq);
- if (err)
- return err;
+ if (state->type & INTEL_PT_INSTRUCTION) {
+ if (pt->sample_instructions) {
+ err = intel_pt_synth_instruction_sample(ptq);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
+ if (pt->sample_cycles) {
+ err = intel_pt_synth_cycle_sample(ptq);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ }
}
if (pt->sample_transactions && (state->type & INTEL_PT_TRANSACTION)) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists