linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria for vendor drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87lexcxq4p.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:58:46 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jgg@...dia.com,
        shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
        yishaih@...dia.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfio-pci: Provide reviewers and acceptance criteria
 for vendor drivers

Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> writes:

>> Also, though: can we avoid creating a new top-level documentation
>> directory for just this file?  It seems like it would logically be a
>> part of the maintainers guide (Documentation/maintainer) ... ?
>
> I'm not sure it's appropriate for Documentation/maintainer/ but it
> would make sense to link it from maintainer-entry-profile.rst there.
> What if I move it to Documentation/driver-api where there are a couple
> other vfio docs?  Thanks,

Sure, that's fine.

Thanks,

jon