linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: make option lists subsection of "Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree" in stable-kernel-rules.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9564bb9c-e8f0-77fa-4464-144efc4854e8@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 13:39:45 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: make option lists subsection of
 "Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree" in
 stable-kernel-rules.rst

On 12/03/22 16.42, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 03:00:40PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>> The table of contents generated for stable-kernel-rules.rst contains
>> "For all other submissions..." section, that includes options
>> subsections. These options subsections should have been subsections of
>> "Procedure for submitting patches..." section. Remove the redundant
>> section.
> 
> The subject line is really long, was that intentional?
> 

Yes, because I have to spell the full section name the option lists
I moved to.

>>
>> Also, convert note about security patches to use `.. note::` block.
> 
> When you have an "also" that's a huge hint it should be a separate
> commit.
> 

OK, will split.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara