[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY6QYSx7pwxJj87ZwQXExk-E6e3_RXvcHFTQibPJP4k+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:12:35 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Use platform_get_irq() to get the interrupt
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:56 AM <cgel.zte@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi (CGEL ZTE) <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> It is not recommened to use platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ)
> for requesting IRQ's resources any more, as they can be not ready yet in
> case of DT-booting.
>
> platform_get_irq() instead is a recommended way for getting IRQ even if
> it was not retrieved earlier.
>
> It also makes code simpler because we're getting "int" value right away
> and no conversion from resource to int is required.
>
> The print function dev_err() is redundant because platform_get_irq()
> already prints an error.
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi (CGEL ZTE) <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
OK that is indeed much better code:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists