lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:05:14 +0800
From:   Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
To:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     stephen@...workplumber.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
        haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org,
        decui@...rosoft.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
        songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hv_netvsc: Add check for kvmalloc_array

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:33:49PM +0800, Greg KH wrote:
>> Thanks, I have tested the patch by kernel_patch_verify,
> 
> What is that?

It a Linux kernel patch static verification helper tool.
Link: https://github.com/nmenon/kernel_patch_verify

>> and all the tests are passed.
> 
> What tests exactly?  How did you fail this allocation?

The failure of allocation is not included in the tests.
And as far as I know, there is not any tool that has the
ability to fail the allocation.
But I think that for safety, the cost of redundant and harmless
check is acceptable.
Also, checking after allocation is a good program pattern.

Thanks,
Jiang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ