[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220314104336.ojkkynvqldrnw2kb@vireshk-i7>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:13:36 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@...il.com>,
SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: spear13xx: Update SPI dma properties
On 14-03-22, 11:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> I don't think that it was meant to have a fixed order: unlike the other
> bindings that define xxx-names properties, dmas require giving
> names to allow the DT to specify more than one possible DMA
> specifier for a given name. This means that nothing may ever just
> rely on an index but has to use the name for lookup.
Is there a way to update the yaml or tooling in that case so it doesn't expect a
fixed order ?
> OTOH, while fixing the order in the binding does not add any
> value, it's also harmless as this should never be able to break
> anything that worked for any combination of old/new dtb and
> kernel, and it's probably easier to express in the binding.
I agree, but such a patch shouldn't be required at all, which caught my
attention. It is fine to merge it and won't break anything, but it shouldn't be
required as well.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists