linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.16 095/121] tracing/osnoise: Force quiescent states while tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220314112746.765514018@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:54:38 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 095/121] tracing/osnoise: Force quiescent states while tracing

From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>

commit caf4c86bf136845982c5103b2661751b40c474c0 upstream.

At the moment running osnoise on a nohz_full CPU or uncontested FIFO
priority and a PREEMPT_RCU kernel might have the side effect of
extending grace periods too much. This will entice RCU to force a
context switch on the wayward CPU to end the grace period, all while
introducing unwarranted noise into the tracer. This behaviour is
unavoidable as overly extending grace periods might exhaust the system's
memory.

This same exact problem is what extended quiescent states (EQS) were
created for, conversely, rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() emulates them by
performing a zero duration EQS. So let's make use of it.

In the common case rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() is fairly inexpensive:
atomically incrementing a local per-CPU counter and doing a store. So it
shouldn't affect osnoise's measurements (which has a 1us granularity),
so we'll call it unanimously.

The uncommon case involve calling rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() after
having the osnoise process:

 - Receive an expedited quiescent state IPI with preemption disabled or
   during an RCU critical section. (activates rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp
   code-path).

 - Being preempted within in an RCU critical section and having the
   subsequent outermost rcu_read_unlock() called with interrupts
   disabled. (t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked code-path).

Neither of those are possible at the moment, and are unlikely to be in
the future given the osnoise's loop design. On top of this, the noise
generated by the situations described above is unavoidable, and if not
exposed by rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle() will be eventually seen in
subsequent rcu_read_unlock() calls or schedule operations.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220307180740.577607-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: bce29ac9ce0b ("trace: Add osnoise tracer")
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

--- a/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_osnoise.c
@@ -1388,6 +1388,26 @@ static int run_osnoise(void)
 		}

 		/*
+		 * In some cases, notably when running on a nohz_full CPU with
+		 * a stopped tick PREEMPT_RCU has no way to account for QSs.
+		 * This will eventually cause unwarranted noise as PREEMPT_RCU
+		 * will force preemption as the means of ending the current
+		 * grace period. We avoid this problem by calling
+		 * rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle(), which performs a zero duration
+		 * EQS allowing PREEMPT_RCU to end the current grace period.
+		 * This call shouldn't be wrapped inside an RCU critical
+		 * section.
+		 *
+		 * Note that in non PREEMPT_RCU kernels QSs are handled through
+		 * cond_resched()
+		 */
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU)) {
+			local_irq_disable();
+			rcu_momentary_dyntick_idle();
+			local_irq_enable();
+		}
+
+		/*
 		 * For the non-preemptive kernel config: let threads runs, if
 		 * they so wish.
 		 */