[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220314112744.636613002@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 12:53:21 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.16 018/121] virtio-blk: Dont use MAX_DISCARD_SEGMENTS if max_discard_seg is zero
From: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
[ Upstream commit dacc73ed0b88f1a787ec20385f42ca9dd9eddcd0 ]
Currently the value of max_discard_segment will be set to
MAX_DISCARD_SEGMENTS (256) with no basis in hardware if device
set 0 to max_discard_seg in configuration space. It's incorrect
since the device might not be able to handle such large descriptors.
To fix it, let's follow max_segments restrictions in this case.
Fixes: 1f23816b8eb8 ("virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support")
Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304100058.116-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 6ae38776e30e..87f239eb0a99 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -926,9 +926,15 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
virtio_cread(vdev, struct virtio_blk_config, max_discard_seg,
&v);
+
+ /*
+ * max_discard_seg == 0 is out of spec but we always
+ * handled it.
+ */
+ if (!v)
+ v = sg_elems - 2;
blk_queue_max_discard_segments(q,
- min_not_zero(v,
- MAX_DISCARD_SEGMENTS));
+ min(v, MAX_DISCARD_SEGMENTS));
blk_queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_DISCARD, q);
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists