[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220315221539.2959167-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:15:39 +0000
From: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] block/bfq-iosched: Fix spelling mistake "tenative" -> "tentative"
There is a spelling mistake in a bfq_log_bfqq message. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 064f6b4c1c16..2e0dd68a3cbe 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -2153,7 +2153,7 @@ static void bfq_check_waker(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq,
bfqq->waker_detection_started = now_ns;
bfq_bfqq_name(bfqq->tentative_waker_bfqq, waker_name,
MAX_BFQQ_NAME_LENGTH);
- bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "set tenative waker %s", waker_name);
+ bfq_log_bfqq(bfqd, bfqq, "set tentative waker %s", waker_name);
} else /* Same tentative waker queue detected again */
bfqq->num_waker_detections++;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists