[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489ef3a4-2f9b-f773-f6bf-90199f995e67@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:11:30 +0800
From: "Guozihua (Scott)" <guozihua@...wei.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>, <wangweiyang2@...wei.com>,
<xiujianfeng@...wei.com>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<peterhuewe@....de>, <jgg@...pe.ca>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: Fix memory leak in tpmm_chip_alloc
On 2022/3/12 0:34, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 11:33 +0800, Guozihua (Scott) wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2022/3/7 21:45, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 06:48:27PM +0800, GUO Zihua wrote:
>>>> Fix a memory leak in tpmm_chip_alloc. devm_add_action_or_reset would
>>>> call put_device on error, while tpm->devs is left untouched. Call
>>>> put_device on tpm->devs as well if devm_add_action_or_reset returns an
>>>> error.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: fdc915f7f719 ("tpm: expose spaces via a device link /dev/tpmrm")
>>>> Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <guozihua@...wei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>>>> index b009e7479b70..0a92334e8c40 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c
>>>> @@ -308,6 +308,12 @@ static int tpm_class_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void tpm_chip_free(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>>>> +{
>>>> + put_device(&chip->devs);
>>>> + put_device(&chip->dev);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> /**
>>>> * tpm_chip_alloc() - allocate a new struct tpm_chip instance
>>>> * @pdev: device to which the chip is associated
>>>> @@ -396,8 +402,7 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>>>> return chip;
>>>>
>>>> out:
>>>> - put_device(&chip->devs);
>>>> - put_device(&chip->dev);
>>>> + tpm_chip_free(chip);
>>>> return ERR_PTR(rc);
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_chip_alloc);
>>>> @@ -420,8 +425,8 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpmm_chip_alloc(struct device *pdev,
>>>> return chip;
>>>>
>>>> rc = devm_add_action_or_reset(pdev,
>>>> - (void (*)(void *)) put_device,
>>>> - &chip->dev);
>>>> + (void (*)(void *)) tpm_chip_free,
>>>> + chip);
>>>> if (rc)
>>>> return ERR_PTR(rc);
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 2.17.1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please test against the latest in
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git
>>>
>>> and share your results.
>>>
>>> BR, Jarkko
>>> .
>>
>> Hi Jarkko,
>>
>> I'll do that. Do we have a test set for TPM? Or do we just build and run
>> it and see if everything works as expected?
>>
>> This is an error handling optimization BTW.
>
> There is kselftest in tools/testing/kselftes/tpm2 that you can use
> but do not have to.
>
> BR, Jarkko
>
>
Hi Jarkko,
The code on the master branch on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jarkko/linux-tpmdd.git
seems to be quite different from what I saw on linux upstream. Namely
tpm_chip->devs does not exist on linux-tpmdd. Has this member been deleted?
--
Best
GUO Zihua
Powered by blists - more mailing lists