| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87pmmn3eh6.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:40:53 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Abhishek Goel <huntbag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: Only re-generate demotion targets when a numa
node changes its N_CPU state
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> writes:
> Abhishek reported that after patch [1], hotplug operations are
> taking ~double the expected time. [2]
>
> The reason behind is that the CPU callbacks that migrate_on_reclaim_init()
> sets always call set_migration_target_nodes() whenever a CPU is brought
> up/down.
> But we only care about numa nodes going from having cpus to become
> cpuless, and vice versa, as that influences the demotion_target order.
>
> We do already have two CPU callbacks (vmstat_cpu_online() and vmstat_cpu_dead())
> that check exactly that, so get rid of the CPU callbacks in
> migrate_on_reclaim_init() and only call set_migration_target_nodes() from
> vmstat_cpu_{dead,online}() whenever a numa node change its N_CPU state.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210721063926.3024591-2-ying.huang@intel.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/eb438ddd-2919-73d4-bd9f-b7eecdd9577a@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
>
> Fixes: 884a6e5d1f93b ("mm/migrate: update node demotion order on hotplug events")
> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Tested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Reported-by: Abhishek Goel <huntbag@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - Add feedback from Huang Ying
> - Add tags
> v1 -> v2:
> - Add fedback from Huang Ying
> - Add feedback from Baolin Wang
> ---
> include/linux/migrate.h | 8 +++++++
> mm/migrate.c | 47 +++++++++--------------------------------
> mm/vmstat.c | 13 +++++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/migrate.h b/include/linux/migrate.h
> index db96e10eb8da..90e75d5a54d6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/migrate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/migrate.h
> @@ -48,7 +48,15 @@ int folio_migrate_mapping(struct address_space *mapping,
> struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *folio, int extra_count);
>
> extern bool numa_demotion_enabled;
> +extern void migrate_on_reclaim_init(void);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +extern void set_migration_target_nodes(void);
> #else
> +static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
> +#endif
> +#else
> +
> +static inline void set_migration_target_nodes(void) {}
>
> static inline void putback_movable_pages(struct list_head *l) {}
> static inline int migrate_pages(struct list_head *l, new_page_t new,
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index e8a6933af68d..2561881f03b2 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -3193,7 +3193,7 @@ static void __set_migration_target_nodes(void)
> /*
> * For callers that do not hold get_online_mems() already.
> */
> -static void set_migration_target_nodes(void)
> +void set_migration_target_nodes(void)
> {
> get_online_mems();
> __set_migration_target_nodes();
> @@ -3257,51 +3257,24 @@ static int __meminit migrate_on_reclaim_callback(struct notifier_block *self,
> return notifier_from_errno(0);
> }
>
> -/*
> - * React to hotplug events that might affect the migration targets
> - * like events that online or offline NUMA nodes.
> - *
> - * The ordering is also currently dependent on which nodes have
> - * CPUs. That means we need CPU on/offline notification too.
> - */
> -static int migration_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> -{
> - set_migration_target_nodes();
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int migration_offline_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> +void __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
> {
> - set_migration_target_nodes();
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static int __init migrate_on_reclaim_init(void)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> node_demotion = kmalloc_array(nr_node_ids,
> sizeof(struct demotion_nodes),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> WARN_ON(!node_demotion);
>
> - ret = cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_DEAD, "mm/demotion:offline",
CPUHP_MM_DEMOTION_DEAD and CPUHP_AP_MM_DEMOTION_ONLINE needs to be
deleted from include/linux/cpuhotplug.h too.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
> - NULL, migration_offline_cpu);
> + hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
> /*
> - * In the unlikely case that this fails, the automatic
> - * migration targets may become suboptimal for nodes
> - * where N_CPU changes. With such a small impact in a
> - * rare case, do not bother trying to do anything special.
> + * At this point, all numa nodes with memory/CPus have their state
> + * properly set, so we can build the demotion order now.
> + * Let us hold the cpu_hotplug lock just, as we could possibily have
> + * CPU hotplug events during boot.
> */
> - WARN_ON(ret < 0);
> - ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_MM_DEMOTION_ONLINE, "mm/demotion:online",
> - migration_online_cpu, NULL);
> - WARN_ON(ret < 0);
> -
> - hotplug_memory_notifier(migrate_on_reclaim_callback, 100);
> - return 0;
> + cpus_read_lock();
> + set_migration_target_nodes();
> + cpus_read_unlock();
> }
> -late_initcall(migrate_on_reclaim_init);
> #endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
>
> bool numa_demotion_enabled = false;
[snip]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists