[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1UC5sm8T7jRPUKTH-r922ZsT+5wQcknwFqAZrPQhuQNw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:27:41 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: remove support for NOMMU ARMv4/v5
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:00 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:23 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 2:22 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> > > Just delete these, I do have these CPU tiles around but they are so obscure
> > > and I never got around to even testing to boot them.
> >
> > Right, of course you couldn't boot test them because it has been
> > impossible to even select them in Kconfig for years.
>
> Correct, I mean never got around to the whole cycle of "let's make this
> thing boot" and then stumbling over things like that :D
>
> > I've added
> > a patch to completely remove the five v4/v5 NOMMU cores now,
> > will send that later.
>
> Excellent.
>
> > There are five more cores that are only referenced by mach-integrator
> > that are supposed to work (922T, 1020, 1020E, 1022, 1026). Have you
> > ever tested those, or should we consider removing them as well?
>
> Not the 10xx variants, but 920T and 922T I have tested and I
> still have the tiles, while my favourite tile that is usually fitted is
> ARM926EJ-S.
Ok, then I would suggest we keep 922t and 1026 (which Robin mentioned)
but remove the others (1020,1020e, 1022).
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists