lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:16:59 +0000
From:   "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>
CC:     "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Kumar, Sanjay K" <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Zanussi, Tom" <tom.zanussi@...el.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/8] Enable PASID for DMA API users

> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 1:07 PM
> 
> Some modern accelerators such as Intel's Data Streaming Accelerator (DSA)
> require PASID in DMA requests to be operational. Specifically, the work
> submissions with ENQCMD on shared work queues require PASIDs. The use
> cases
> include both user DMA with shared virtual addressing (SVA) and in-kernel
> DMA similar to legacy DMA w/o PASID. Here we address the latter.
> 
> DMA mapping API is the de facto standard for in-kernel DMA. However, it
> operates on a per device or Requester ID(RID) basis which is not
> PASID-aware. To leverage DMA API for devices relies on PASIDs, this
> patchset introduces the following APIs
> 
> 1. A driver facing API that enables DMA API PASID usage:
> iommu_enable_pasid_dma(struct device *dev, ioasid_t &pasid);

Should this be called dma_enable_pasid() since it's about DMA API? Doing
so also avoids the driver to include iommu.h.

Thanks
Kevin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ