linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] driver/nvme/host: Support duplicated nsid for the private ns

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 09:46:11 +0100
From:   "hch@....de" <hch@....de>
To:     Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>
Cc:     "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, Sungup Moon <sungup.moon@...sung.com>,
        "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] driver/nvme/host: Support duplicated nsid for the
 private ns

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 10:42:56AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>>>> +	 * We also do this for private namespaces as the namespace sharing flag
>>>> +	 * could change after a rescan.
>>>
>>> What happens in this case? we now have non-unique shared namespaces?
>>
>> The non-uniqueue NSIDs can only happen for private namespaces.
>
> But what happens if this changes upon a rescan as you commented?

Well, it can't change to shared as the nsids are non-unique.  If we
want to be paranoid we could add a sanity check for that, but then
again there are a bunch of other things where we could be more paranoid.