[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220315205259.71b4238a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 20:52:59 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the folio tree with the ubifs-fixes
tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the folio tree got a conflict in:
fs/ubifs/file.c
between commit:
3b67db8a6ca8 ("ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private")
from the ubifs-fixes tree and commit:
c337f2f4f746 ("ubifs: Convert from invalidatepage to invalidate_folio")
from the folio tree.
I fixed it up (I hope - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/ubifs/file.c
index 6b45a037a047,8a9ffc2d4167..000000000000
--- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
@@@ -1304,8 -1304,8 +1304,8 @@@ static void ubifs_invalidate_folio(stru
release_existing_page_budget(c);
atomic_long_dec(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
- detach_page_private(page);
- ClearPageChecked(page);
- folio_clear_private(folio);
++ folio_detach_private(folio);
+ folio_clear_checked(folio);
}
int ubifs_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists