lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:05:43 +0000
From:   Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
To:     Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] ceph: add support for encrypted snapshot names

Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com> writes:
<...>
> I think there has one simple way. Just think about without setting the
> fscrypt_auth for the '.snap' dir's inode, that is without your this 
> patch it works well.
>
> That's because when we create a snapshot under '.snap' dir, since the '.snap'
> dir related inode doesn't have the fscrypt_auth been filled, so when creating a
> new inode for the snapshot it won't fill the fscrypt_auth for the new inode. And
> then in the handle_reply() it can fill the fscrypt auth as expected.
>
> You can make sure that in the ceph_new_inode() just skip setting the
> fscrypt_auth for the new inode if the parent dir is a snapdir, that is 
> '.snap/'. And this will just leave it to be filled in the handle_reply().

Ah! That's it!  Great suggestion, I'll go test this and send out a new
version later.  (And I think I'll need to rebase my patches on top of the
latest changes too.)

Cheers,
-- 
Luís

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ