| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:04:07 +0000
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
will@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
joel@...lfernandes.org, sashal@...nel.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, duyuyang@...il.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
willy@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, amir73il@...il.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
kernel-team@....com, linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, minchan@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov.dev@...il.com, sj@...nel.org, jglisse@...hat.com,
dennis@...nel.org, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
rientjes@...gle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, ngupta@...are.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, paolo.valente@...aro.org,
josef@...icpanda.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz, jack@...e.com,
jlayton@...nel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com, hch@...radead.org,
djwong@...nel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
airlied@...ux.ie, rodrigosiqueiramelo@...il.com,
melissa.srw@...il.com, hamohammed.sa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/24] DEPT(Dependency Tracker)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:59:06PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 01:53:26AM +0000, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 04:06:19PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > Hi Linus and folks,
> > >
> > > I've been developing a tool for detecting deadlock possibilities by
> > > tracking wait/event rather than lock(?) acquisition order to try to
> > > cover all synchonization machanisms. It's done on v5.17-rc1 tag.
> > >
> > > https://github.com/lgebyungchulpark/linux-dept/commits/dept1.14_on_v5.17-rc1
> > >
> >
> > Small feedback unrelated to thread:
> > I'm not sure "Need to expand the ring buffer" is something to call
> > WARN(). Is this stack trace useful for something?
>
> Yeah. It seems to happen too often. I won't warn it. Thanks.
Thanks!
> > ========
> >
> > Hello Byungchul. These are two warnings of DEPT on system.
> > Both cases look similar.
> >
> > In what case DEPT says (unknown)?
> > I'm not sure we can properly debug this.
> >
> > ===================================================
> > DEPT: Circular dependency has been detected.
> > 5.17.0-rc1+ #3 Tainted: G W
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > summary
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > *** AA DEADLOCK ***
> >
> > context A
> > [S] (unknown)(&vfork:0)
> > [W] wait_for_completion_killable(&vfork:0)
> > [E] complete(&vfork:0)
>
> All the reports look like having to do with kernel_clone(). I need to
> check it more. Thank you very much.
>
> You are awesome, Hyeonggon.
>
Thank you. Let me know if there is something I can help!
> Thank you,
> Byungchul
>
> > [S]: start of the event context
> > [W]: the wait blocked
> > [E]: the event not reachable
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > context A's detail
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > context A
> > [S] (unknown)(&vfork:0)
> > [W] wait_for_completion_killable(&vfork:0)
> > [E] complete(&vfork:0)
> >
> > [S] (unknown)(&vfork:0):
> > (N/A)
> >
> > [W] wait_for_completion_killable(&vfork:0):
> > [<ffffffc00802204c>] kernel_clone+0x25c/0x2b8
> > stacktrace:
> > dept_wait+0x74/0x88
> > wait_for_completion_killable+0x60/0xa0
> > kernel_clone+0x25c/0x2b8
> > __do_sys_clone+0x5c/0x74
> > __arm64_sys_clone+0x18/0x20
> > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0xc4
> > do_el0_svc+0x98/0xd0
> > el0_svc+0x44/0xe4
> > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0x12c
> > el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
> >
> > [E] complete(&vfork:0):
> > [<ffffffc00801f49c>] mm_release+0x7c/0x90
> > stacktrace:
> > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > complete+0x48/0x98
> > mm_release+0x7c/0x90
> > exit_mm_release+0xc/0x14
> > do_exit+0x1b4/0x81c
> > do_group_exit+0x30/0x9c
> > __wake_up_parent+0x0/0x24
> > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0xc4
> > do_el0_svc+0x98/0xd0
> > el0_svc+0x44/0xe4
> > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0x12c
> > el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > information that might be helpful
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > CPU: 6 PID: 229 Comm: start-stop-daem Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc1+ #3
> > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > Call trace:
> > dump_backtrace.part.0+0x9c/0xc4
> > show_stack+0x14/0x28
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xcc
> > dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
> > print_circle+0x2d4/0x438
> > cb_check_dl+0x44/0x70
> > bfs+0x60/0x168
> > add_dep+0x88/0x11c
> > do_event.constprop.0+0x19c/0x2c0
> > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > complete+0x48/0x98
> > mm_release+0x7c/0x90
> > exit_mm_release+0xc/0x14
> > do_exit+0x1b4/0x81c
> > do_group_exit+0x30/0x9c
> > __wake_up_parent+0x0/0x24
> > invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x78/0xc4
> > do_el0_svc+0x98/0xd0
> > el0_svc+0x44/0xe4
> > el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb0/0x12c
> > el0t_64_sync+0x158/0x15c
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ===================================================
> > DEPT: Circular dependency has been detected.
> > 5.17.0-rc1+ #3 Tainted: G W
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > summary
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > *** AA DEADLOCK ***
> >
> > context A
> > [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0)
> > [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0)
> > [E] complete(&try_completion:0)
> >
> > [S]: start of the event context
> > [W]: the wait blocked
> > [E]: the event not reachable
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > context A's detail
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > context A
> > [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0)
> > [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0)
> > [E] complete(&try_completion:0)
> >
> > [S] (unknown)(&try_completion:0):
> > (N/A)
> >
> > [W] wait_for_completion_timeout(&try_completion:0):
> > [<ffffffc008166bf4>] kunit_try_catch_run+0xb4/0x160
> > stacktrace:
> > dept_wait+0x74/0x88
> > wait_for_completion_timeout+0x64/0xa0
> > kunit_try_catch_run+0xb4/0x160
> > kunit_test_try_catch_successful_try_no_catch+0x3c/0x98
> > kunit_try_run_case+0x9c/0xa0
> > kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x1c/0x28
> > kthread+0xd4/0xe4
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> >
> > [E] complete(&try_completion:0):
> > [<ffffffc00803dce4>] kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x20
> > stacktrace:
> > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > complete+0x48/0x98
> > kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x20
> > kunit_try_catch_throw+0x0/0x1c
> > kthread+0xd4/0xe4
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > information that might be helpful
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > CPU: 15 PID: 132 Comm: kunit_try_catch Tainted: G W 5.17.0-rc1+ #3
> > Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> > Call trace:
> > dump_backtrace.part.0+0x9c/0xc4
> > show_stack+0x14/0x28
> > dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xcc
> > dump_stack+0x14/0x2c
> > print_circle+0x2d4/0x438
> > cb_check_dl+0x44/0x70
> > bfs+0x60/0x168
> > add_dep+0x88/0x11c
> > do_event.constprop.0+0x19c/0x2c0
> > dept_event+0xe0/0x100
> > complete+0x48/0x98
> > kthread_complete_and_exit+0x18/0x20
> > kunit_try_catch_throw+0x0/0x1c
> > kthread+0xd4/0xe4
> > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
>
>
> > --
> > Thank you, You are awesome!
> > Hyeonggon :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists