linux-kernel - Re: [v3 10/19] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support tdm in platform driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8aa94e65-0a3c-47dc-44d2-60d5dc996cf0@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:19:11 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        aaronyu@...gle.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, trevor.wu@...iatek.com,
        tzungbi@...gle.com, julianbraha@...il.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [v3 10/19] ASoC: mediatek: mt8186: support tdm in platform driver

Il 15/03/22 14:15, Mark Brown ha scritto:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 11:39:11AM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 13/03/22 16:10, Jiaxin Yu ha scritto:
>>> Add mt8186 tdm dai driver.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@...iatek.com>
>>> ---
>>>    sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-tdm.c | 695 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 695 insertions(+)
>>>    create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-tdm.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-tdm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8186/mt8186-dai-tdm.c
> 
> Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying.  Doing this
> makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure
> it won't be missed by people scrolling through the irrelevant quoted
> material.


I'm sorry Mark, I usually do that, but this time it appears that for
some reason I forgot to delete the context on top of my reply, and ended
up deleting only the one on the bottom of it.

I'll pay more attention to that next time.
Sorry again.