lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164735166243.3687547.12763908878922774952.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:41:02 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH V4 0/6] spi: mediatek: add single/quad mode support

On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:24:05 +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> This series of patches are based on spi for-next, and provide 6 patches to support MT7986.
> 
> v4:
>  1. fix Rob comment in v3;
>  2. use "mediatek,mt7986-spi-ipm","mediatek,spi-ipm"
> 
> v3:
>  1. add Rob Acked-by in "dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for MT7986 with single mode";
>  2. add a fix patch "spi: mediatek: support tick_delay without enhance_timing";
>  3. fix Angelogioacchino comments;
>  4. use mt7986 instead of ipm in dt-binding.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/6] spi: mediatek: support tick_delay without enhance_timing
      commit: 03b1be379dcee2e9c866c2a455a1a4a9581b3efd
[2/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for MT7986
      commit: da40a352db2bae470a3eea038cc53454c24e67f3
[3/6] spi: mediatek: add ipm design support for MT7986
      commit: 7e963fb2a33ce488e65258ab5be38a4855923033

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ