[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164735166243.3687547.12763908878922774952.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 13:41:02 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH V4 0/6] spi: mediatek: add single/quad mode support
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:24:05 +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> This series of patches are based on spi for-next, and provide 6 patches to support MT7986.
>
> v4:
> 1. fix Rob comment in v3;
> 2. use "mediatek,mt7986-spi-ipm","mediatek,spi-ipm"
>
> v3:
> 1. add Rob Acked-by in "dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for MT7986 with single mode";
> 2. add a fix patch "spi: mediatek: support tick_delay without enhance_timing";
> 3. fix Angelogioacchino comments;
> 4. use mt7986 instead of ipm in dt-binding.
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/6] spi: mediatek: support tick_delay without enhance_timing
commit: 03b1be379dcee2e9c866c2a455a1a4a9581b3efd
[2/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for MT7986
commit: da40a352db2bae470a3eea038cc53454c24e67f3
[3/6] spi: mediatek: add ipm design support for MT7986
commit: 7e963fb2a33ce488e65258ab5be38a4855923033
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark
Powered by blists - more mailing lists