lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjCZkkv//EhvxszH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:50:10 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm: ssd130x: Reduce temporary buffer sizes

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 12:07:06PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> ssd130x_clear_screen() allocates a temporary buffer sized to hold one
> byte per pixel, while it only needs to hold one bit per pixel.
> 
> ssd130x_fb_blit_rect() allocates a temporary buffer sized to hold one
> byte per pixel for the whole frame buffer, while it only needs to hold
> one bit per pixel for the part that is to be updated.
> Pass dst_pitch to drm_fb_xrgb8888_to_mono_reversed(), as we have already
> calculated it anyway.

Can we use bitmap API? bitmap_zalloc() / etc ?


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ