linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND] genirq: add log level to printk in print_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <874k3z71xn.ffs@tglx>
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:58:12 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     wudaemon <wudaemon@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND] genirq: add log level to printk in print_irq_desc

On Sun, Mar 13 2022 at 03:44, wudaemon@....com wrote:
> add KERN_DEBUG level for debuging purpose, use checkpatch.pl check prompt:

... and then ignore the checkpatch.pl output vs. the patch which "fixes"
the problems:

WARNING: Prefer [subsystem eg: netdev]_dbg([subsystem]dev, ... then dev_dbg(dev, ... then pr_debug(...  to printk(KERN_DEBUG ...
#29: FILE: kernel/irq/debug.h:6:
+#define ___P(f) do {if (desc->status_use_accessors & f) printk(KERN_DEBUG "%14s set\n", #f); } while (0)

and 6 more of the same...

> Signed-off-by: wudaemon <wudaemon@....com>

Please read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst especially the
chapter about the Developer's Certification of Origin:

   "... using your real name (sorry, no pseudonyms or anonymous contributions.)"

Thanks,

        tglx