lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 22:08:57 +0800
From:   Jui-Tse Huang <juitse.huang@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Huaixin Chang <changhuaixin@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>,
        Chun-Hung Tseng <henrybear327@...il.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jui-Tse Huang <juitse.huang@...il.com>,
        Ching-Chun Huang <jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Brendan Gregg <bgregg@...flix.com>,
        Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] docs/scheduler: Introduce the doc of load average

The load average is one of a common as well as easy observed statistic
provied by Linux, but still not well documented, which makes the numbers
that users observes from the output of top, htop or other system
monitoring application are only numbers. This patch gives a discussion
on how Linux calculates the load average as well as what metrics are
concerned while calculating the load average.

The discussion flow is divided into several parts:
1. The expression used to get the load average.
2. Why Linux choose such average method from the other.
2. The meaning of each term in the expression.
3. The metrics, that is, the type of tasks that will be covered in the
   calculation.
4. A brief explanation over the fixed-point nubmer since the weights
   defined in the Linux kernel are based on it.

Signed-off-by: Jui-Tse Huang <juitse.huang@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ching-Chun (Jim) Huang <jserv@...s.ncku.edu.tw>
Co-Developed-by: Yiwei Lin <s921975628@...il.com>

---

v3:
  - Fix typo (Randy Dunlap)
  - Add further reading that links to Brendan Gregg's blog

v2:
  - Fix typo (Chun-Hung Tseng) 

 Documentation/scheduler/index.rst        |  1 +
 Documentation/scheduler/load-average.rst | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/scheduler/load-average.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
index 88900aabdbf7..bdc779b4190f 100644
--- a/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/index.rst
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ Linux Scheduler
     sched-nice-design
     sched-rt-group
     sched-stats
+    load-average
 
     text_files
 
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/load-average.rst b/Documentation/scheduler/load-average.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..27ce6cbae5f4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/load-average.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+============
+Load Average
+============
+
+The load average, provided by common operating systems, indicates the average
+number of system load over a period of time.  In Linux, it shows the average
+number of tasks running and waiting for CPU time. The following expression is
+used in Linux to update the load average::
+
+                / 0                                      , if t = 0
+    load_{t} = |
+                \ load_{t - 1} * exp + active * (1 - exp), otherwise
+
+The expression represents the exponential moving average of the historical
+loading of the system. There are several reasons that Linux kernel chooses
+exponential moving average from other similar average equations such as simple
+moving average or cumulative moving average:
+
+#. The exponential moving average consumes fixed memory space, while the simple
+   moving average has O(n) space complexity where n is the number of timeslices
+   within a given interval.
+#. The exponential moving average not only applies a higher weight to the most
+   recent record but also declines the weight exponentially, which makes the
+   resulting load average reflect the situation of the current system. Neither
+   the simple moving average nor cumulative moving average has this feature.
+
+In the expression, the load_{t} indicates the calculated load average at the
+given time t.
+The active is the most recent recorded system load. In Linux, the system load
+means the number of tasks in the state of TASK_RUNNING or TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
+of the entire system. Tasks with TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state are usually waiting
+for disk I/O or holding an uninterruptible lock, which is considered as a part
+of system resource, thus, Linux kernel covers them while calculating the load
+average.
+The exp means the weight applied to the previous report of load average, while
+(1 - exp) is the weight applied to the most recently recorded system load.
+There are three different weights defined in the Linux kernel, in
+include/linux/sched/loadavg.h, to perform statistics in various timescales::
+
+    // include/linux/sched/loadavg.h
+    ...
+    #define EXP_1    1884    /* 1/exp(5sec/1min) as fixed-point */
+    #define EXP_5    2014    /* 1/exp(5sec/5min) */
+    #define EXP_15   2037    /* 1/exp(5sec/15min) */
+    ...
+
+According to the expression shown on the top of this page, the weight (exp)
+controls how much of the last load load_{t - 1} will take place in the
+calculation of current load, while (1 - exp) is the weight applied to the most
+recent record of system load active.
+
+Due to the security issue, the weights are defined as fixed-point numbers based
+on the unsigned integer rather than floating-pointing numbers. The introduction
+of the fixed-point number keeps the FPU away from the calculation process. Since
+the precision of the fixed-point used in the Linux kernel is 11 bits, a
+fixed-point can be converted to a floating-point by dividing it by 2048, as in
+the expressions shown bellow::
+
+    EXP_1  = 1884 / 2048 = 0.919922
+    EXP_5  = 2014 / 2048 = 0.983398
+    EXP_15 = 2037 / 2048 = 0.994629
+
+Which indicates the weights applied to active are::
+
+    (1 - EXP_1)  = (1 - 0.919922) = 0.080078
+    (1 - EXP_5)  = (1 - 0.983398) = 0.016602
+    (1 - EXP_15) = (1 - 0.994629) = 0.005371
+
+The load average will be updated every 5 seconds. Each time the scheduler_tick()
+be called, the function calc_global_load_tick() will also be invoked, which
+makes the active of each CPU core be calculated and be merged globally. Finally,
+the load average will be updated with that global active.
+
+As a user, the load average can be observed via top, htop, or other system
+monitor application, or more directly, by the following command::
+
+    $ cat /proc/loadavg
+
+Further Reading
+---------------
+The explanation and analysis done by Brendan Gregg on `his blog
+<https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2017-08-08/linux-load-averages.html>`_.
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ