[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXA=Wo2mW_N9GGDY_NBgyhK3fDBpUO=mJb-CdoYvKU70w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 15:50:51 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, drinkcat@...omium.org,
Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@...omium.org>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
Maoguang Meng <maoguang.meng@...iatek.com>,
daoyuan huang <daoyuan.huang@...iatek.com>,
Ping-Hsun Wu <ping-hsun.wu@...iatek.com>,
menghui.lin@...iatek.com, sj.huang@...iatek.com,
allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com, randy.wu@...iatek.com,
jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com, roy-cw.yeh@...iatek.com,
river.cheng@...iatek.com, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/6] soc: mediatek: mutex: add common interface to
accommodate multiple modules operationg MUTEX
Hi Rob,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 3:37 PM Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net> wrote:
> On 3/15/22 4:10 AM, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> > Il 15/03/22 07:10, Moudy Ho ha scritto:
> >> In order to allow multiple modules to operate MUTEX hardware through
> >> a common interfrace, a flexible index "mtk_mutex_table_index" needs to
> >> be added to replace original component ID so that like DDP and MDP
> >> can add their own MUTEX table settings independently.
> >>
> >> In addition, 4 generic interface "mtk_mutex_set_mod", "mtk_mutex_set_sof",
> >> "mtk_mutex_clear_mod" and "mtk_mutex_clear_sof" have been added, which is
> >> expected to replace the "mtk_mutex_add_comp" and "mtk_mutex_remove_comp"
> >> pair originally dedicated to DDP in the future.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@...iatek.com>
> >> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mutex.c
> >> @@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ struct mtk_mutex_data {
> >> const unsigned int *mutex_sof;
> >> const unsigned int mutex_mod_reg;
> >> const unsigned int mutex_sof_reg;
> >> + const unsigned long long *mutex_table_mod;
> >
> > Can we change this to u64 instead?
>
> Linux is still LP64, correct?
On 64-bit platforms, yes.
Note that this is about "long long", which is 64-bit on all Linux platforms.
But as the table seems to be used to store 2 32-bit values, it doesn't hurt
to be explicit and use "u64"? Or a struct with 2 "u32" values?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists