linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220315155226.GC274290@lothringen>
Date:   Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:52:26 +0100
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        Uladzislau Rezki <uladzislau.rezki@...y.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rcu: synchronize_rcu[_expedited]() related fixes

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:35:04PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 01:26:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 02:37:35PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > 
> > > A few fixes especially for expedited GP polling causing a stall on TREE07,
> > > as reported by Paul.
> > > 
> > > We may still want to optimize start_poll_synchronize_rcu_expedited() on
> > > UP-no-preempt but I think Paul may be implying this while doing other
> > > fixes.
> > > 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/linux-dynticks.git
> > > 	rcu/dev
> > > 
> > > HEAD: 6e5fd7e614fd5c8f0fffeaa140b7ea697bfeb096
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 	Frederic
> > 
> > I have pulled these in for review and testing, thank you!!!  I have
> > started a ~90-minute test and will let you know how that goes.
> 
> And TREE05 doesn't like this much.  I get too-short grace periods.
> TREE05 is unusual in being the one with the kernel build with
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y but also with CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n.
> 
> Running tests of the commits individually.

Ouch, please test the following:

---
>From f180dd5809d2c3a6343cbd13f244b7b7f110a506 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:33:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] rcutorture: Call preempt_schedule() through static call/key

rcutorture sometimes want to trigger a random scheduler preemption call
while simulating a read delay. However a direct call to
preempt_schedule() is not desirable because it bypasses the static
call/key filter used by CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC. This breaks the
no-preempt assumption in case the dynamic preemption mode is "none".

For example rcu_blocking_is_gp() is fooled and abbreviates grace periods
when the CPU runs in no-preempt UP mode.

Fix this with making torture_preempt_schedule() to call through
preempt dynamic static call/key.

Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
 include/linux/torture.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/torture.h b/include/linux/torture.h
index 63fa4196e51c..7038104463e4 100644
--- a/include/linux/torture.h
+++ b/include/linux/torture.h
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void _torture_stop_kthread(char *m, struct task_struct **tp);
 	_torture_stop_kthread("Stopping " #n " task", &(tp))
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPTION
-#define torture_preempt_schedule() preempt_schedule()
+#define torture_preempt_schedule() __preempt_schedule()
 #else
 #define torture_preempt_schedule()	do { } while (0)
 #endif
-- 
2.25.1