[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8735jizq8w.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:37:51 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V3 2/2 UPDATE] NUMA balancing: avoid to migrate task to
CPU-less node
Hi, Peter,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:
> Hi, Peter,
>
> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> writes:
>
>> In a typical memory tiering system, there's no CPU in slow (PMEM) NUMA
>> nodes. But if the number of the hint page faults on a PMEM node is
>> the max for a task, The current NUMA balancing policy may try to place
>> the task on the PMEM node instead of DRAM node. This is unreasonable,
>> because there's no CPU in PMEM NUMA nodes. To fix this, CPU-less
>> nodes are ignored when searching the migration target node for a task
>> in this patch.
>>
>> To test the patch, we run a workload that accesses more memory in PMEM
>> node than memory in DRAM node. Without the patch, the PMEM node will
>> be chosen as preferred node in task_numa_placement(). While the DRAM
>> node will be chosen instead with the patch.
>>
>> Known issue: I don't have systems to test complex NUMA topology type,
>> for example, NUMA_BACKPLANE or NUMA_GLUELESS_MESH.
>>
>> v3:
>>
>> - Fix a boot crash for some uncovered marginal condition. Thanks Qian
>> Cai for reporting and testing the bug!
>>
>> - Fix several missing places to use CPU-less nodes as migrating
>> target.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com> # boot crash
>> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
>> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Can you update the patch to fix the bug? Or you prefer the incremental
> patch?
Can you take a look at this?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists