[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YjGD7N++F+ioISHb@lahna>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:30:04 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@...il.com>,
Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@...el.com>,
Yehezkel Bernat <YehezkelShB@...il.com>,
"open list:THUNDERBOLT DRIVER" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] thunderbolt: Automatically authorize PCIe tunnels when
IOMMU is active
Hi Mario,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 04:30:08PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Historically TBT3 in Linux used "Thunderbolt security levels" as a primary
> means of "security" against DMA attacks. This mean that users would need to
> ack any device plugged in via userspace. In ~2018 machines started to use
> the IOMMU for protection, but instead of dropping security levels a
> convoluted flow was introduced:
> * User hotplugs device
> * Driver discovers supported tunnels
> * Driver emits a uevent to userspace that a PCIe tunnel is present
> * Userspace reads 'iommu_dma_protection' attribute (which currently
> indicates an Intel IOMMU is present and was enabled pre-boot not that
> it's active "now")
> * Based on that value userspace then authorizes automatically or prompts
> the user like how security level based support worked.
There are legitimate reasons to disable PCIe tunneling even if the IOMMU
bits are in place. The ACPI _OSC allows the boot firmware to do so and
our "security levels" allows the userspace policy to do the same. I
would not like to change that unless absolutely necessary.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists