linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: add zone to zonelist if populated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:40:08 +0000
From:   Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mgorman@...hsingularity.net, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: add zone to zonelist if populated

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 10:27:11AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>On Thu 03-02-22 02:00:22, Wei Yang wrote:
>> During memory hotplug, when online/offline a zone, we need to rebuild
>> the zonelist for all nodes. Current behavior would lose a valid zone in
>> zonelist since only pick up managed_zone.
>> 
>> There are two cases for a zone with memory but still !managed.
>> 
>>   * all pages were allocated via memblock
>>   * all pages were taken by ballooning / virtio-mem
>> 
>> This state maybe temporary, since both of them may release some memory.
>> Then it end up with a managed zone not in zonelist.
>> 
>> This is introduced in 'commit 6aa303defb74 ("mm, vmscan: only allocate
>> and reclaim from zones with pages managed by the buddy allocator")'.
>> This patch restore the behavior.
>
>It has been introduced to fix a problem described in the the changelog
>(FADUMP configuration making kswapd hogging a cpu). You are not
>explaining why the original issue is not possible after this change.
>

After some reading, here is what I find.

To prevent this problem again, we need to make sure reclaim only applies to
managed_zones. After go through the code, there are only two places we don't
guarantee this when iterating zone.

  1. skip_throttle_noprogress()
  2. throttle_direct_reclaim()

After we make sure vmscan only reclaim on managed_zone, the problem won't be
possible after this change.

BTW, there are another two places use for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(). It's
ok to not check managed_zone, since actually they are doing a node base
iteration.

If this looks good to you, I would adjust the changelog and send two patches
to fix the above two places.

>I also think that this is more of theoretical issue than anything that
>is a real life concern. It is good to state that in the changelog as
>well.
>
>That being said I am not against the change but the changelog needs more
>explanation before I can ack it.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
>> CC: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
>> CC: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> Fixes: 6aa303defb74 ("mm, vmscan: only allocate and reclaim from zones with pages managed by the buddy allocator")
>
>Fixes tag should be really used only if the referenced commit breaks
>something. I do not really see this to be the case here.
>
>Thanks!
>

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me