linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ChromeOS fingerprint binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 07:25:01 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Craig Hesling <hesling@...omium.org>,
        Tom Hughes <tomhughes@...omium.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: Add ChromeOS fingerprint binding

On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Stephen Boyd wrote:

> Quoting Lee Jones (2022-03-15 08:48:08)
> > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > > Quoting Lee Jones (2022-03-15 04:30:49)
> > > > It's tough to say from what I was sent above.
> > > >
> > > > But yes, sounds like it.
> > > >
> > > > We do not want any device 'functionality' in MFD ideally.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I put it next to the existing cros-ec binding. The existing binding is
> > > there because of historical reasons as far as I know. Otherwise it
> > > didn't seem MFD related so I didn't Cc mfd maintainer/list. New file
> > > additions don't usually conflict with anything and this is in the
> > > bindings directory so the driver side maintainer would be picking up the
> > > binding.
> >
> > That's not how it works unfortunately.
> >
> > This file is located in the MFD bindings directory, so I would be
> > picking it up (if it ends up staying here).
> 
> The way it works is arbitrary 

Correct.

> and up to maintainer's choice.

Which *should* be reflected in MAINTAINERS and by extension
get_maintainer.pl.  As is the case here.  :)

> I'll move it out of the mfd directory :)

That does sound like a good solution, thanks Stephen.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog