[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wngujkdm.fsf@waldekranz.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:51:17 +0100
From: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Matt Johnston <matt@...econstruct.com.au>,
Cooper Lees <me@...perlees.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 12/15] net: dsa: Handle MST state changes
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 10:45, Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 18:42, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:25:40AM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
>>> Add the usual trampoline functionality from the generic DSA layer down
>>> to the drivers for MST state changes.
>>>
>>> When a state changes to disabled/blocking/listening, make sure to fast
>>> age any dynamic entries in the affected VLANs (those controlled by the
>>> MSTI in question).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/net/dsa.h | 3 ++
>>> net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 ++
>>> net/dsa/port.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>> net/dsa/slave.c | 6 ++++
>>> 4 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
>>> index 1ddaa2cc5842..0f369f2e9a97 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/dsa.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/dsa.h
>>> @@ -945,7 +945,10 @@ struct dsa_switch_ops {
>>> struct dsa_bridge bridge);
>>> void (*port_stp_state_set)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>>> u8 state);
>>> + int (*port_mst_state_set)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>>> + const struct switchdev_mst_state *state);
>>> void (*port_fast_age)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port);
>>> + int (*port_vlan_fast_age)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u16 vid);
>>> int (*port_pre_bridge_flags)(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
>>> struct switchdev_brport_flags flags,
>>> struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
>>> diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>>> index d90b4cf0c9d2..2ae8996cf7c8 100644
>>> --- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>>> +++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
>>> @@ -215,6 +215,8 @@ static inline struct net_device *dsa_master_find_slave(struct net_device *dev,
>>> void dsa_port_set_tag_protocol(struct dsa_port *cpu_dp,
>>> const struct dsa_device_ops *tag_ops);
>>> int dsa_port_set_state(struct dsa_port *dp, u8 state, bool do_fast_age);
>>> +int dsa_port_set_mst_state(struct dsa_port *dp,
>>> + const struct switchdev_mst_state *state);
>>> int dsa_port_enable_rt(struct dsa_port *dp, struct phy_device *phy);
>>> int dsa_port_enable(struct dsa_port *dp, struct phy_device *phy);
>>> void dsa_port_disable_rt(struct dsa_port *dp);
>>> diff --git a/net/dsa/port.c b/net/dsa/port.c
>>> index 3ac114f6fc22..a2a817bb77b1 100644
>>> --- a/net/dsa/port.c
>>> +++ b/net/dsa/port.c
>>> @@ -30,12 +30,11 @@ static int dsa_port_notify(const struct dsa_port *dp, unsigned long e, void *v)
>>> return dsa_tree_notify(dp->ds->dst, e, v);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(const struct dsa_port *dp)
>>> +static void dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(const struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid)
>>> {
>>> struct net_device *brport_dev = dsa_port_to_bridge_port(dp);
>>> struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info info = {
>>> - /* flush all VLANs */
>>> - .vid = 0,
>>> + .vid = vid,
>>> };
>>>
>>> /* When the port becomes standalone it has already left the bridge.
>>> @@ -57,7 +56,42 @@ static void dsa_port_fast_age(const struct dsa_port *dp)
>>>
>>> ds->ops->port_fast_age(ds, dp->index);
>>>
>>> - dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(dp);
>>> + /* flush all VLANs */
>>> + dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(dp, 0);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dsa_port_vlan_fast_age(const struct dsa_port *dp, u16 vid)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + if (!ds->ops->port_vlan_fast_age)
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> + err = ds->ops->port_vlan_fast_age(ds, dp->index, vid);
>>> +
>>> + if (!err)
>>> + dsa_port_notify_bridge_fdb_flush(dp, vid);
>>> +
>>> + return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int dsa_port_msti_fast_age(const struct dsa_port *dp, u16 msti)
>>> +{
>>> + DECLARE_BITMAP(vids, VLAN_N_VID) = { 0 };
>>> + int err, vid;
>>> +
>>> + err = br_mst_get_info(dsa_port_bridge_dev_get(dp), msti, vids);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + for_each_set_bit(vid, vids, VLAN_N_VID) {
>>> + err = dsa_port_vlan_fast_age(dp, vid);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> static bool dsa_port_can_configure_learning(struct dsa_port *dp)
>>> @@ -118,6 +152,32 @@ static void dsa_port_set_state_now(struct dsa_port *dp, u8 state,
>>> pr_err("DSA: failed to set STP state %u (%d)\n", state, err);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +int dsa_port_set_mst_state(struct dsa_port *dp,
>>> + const struct switchdev_mst_state *state)
>>> +{
>>> + struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + if (!ds->ops->port_mst_state_set)
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> + err = ds->ops->port_mst_state_set(ds, dp->index, state);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + return err;
>>> +
>>> + if (dp->learning) {
>>> + switch (state->state) {
>>> + case BR_STATE_DISABLED:
>>> + case BR_STATE_BLOCKING:
>>> + case BR_STATE_LISTENING:
>>
>> Is there a requirement in br_mst_set_state() to put the switchdev
>> notifier at the end instead of at the beginning?
>
> Not that I can think of. Moving it.
>
>> I'm tempted to ask you to introduce br_mst_get_state(), then assign
>> old_state = br_mst_get_state(dsa_port_bridge_dev_get(dp), state->msti),
>> then perform the VLAN fast age only on the appropriate state transitions,
>> just like the regular fast age.
>
> No time like the present!
>
> Question though:
>
>>> + err = dsa_port_msti_fast_age(dp, state->msti);
>
> If _msti_fast_age returns an error here, do we want that to bubble up to
> the bridge? It seems more important to keep the bridge in sync with the
> hardware. I.e. the hardware state has already been successfully synced,
> we just weren't able to flush all VLANs for some reason. We could revert
> the state I guess, but what if that fails?
>
> Should we settle for a log message?
Or should we set the extack message? Similar to how we report software
fallback of bridging/LAGs?
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int dsa_port_enable_rt(struct dsa_port *dp, struct phy_device *phy)
>>> {
>>> struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>>> @@ -326,6 +386,8 @@ static bool dsa_port_supports_mst(struct dsa_port *dp)
>>> struct dsa_switch *ds = dp->ds;
>>>
>>> return ds->ops->vlan_msti_set &&
>>> + ds->ops->port_mst_state_set &&
>>> + ds->ops->port_vlan_fast_age &&
>>> dsa_port_can_configure_learning(dp);
>>> }
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
>>> index 5e986cdeaae5..4300fc76f3af 100644
>>> --- a/net/dsa/slave.c
>>> +++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
>>> @@ -450,6 +450,12 @@ static int dsa_slave_port_attr_set(struct net_device *dev, const void *ctx,
>>>
>>> ret = dsa_port_set_state(dp, attr->u.stp_state, true);
>>> break;
>>> + case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_MST_STATE:
>>> + if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_port(dp, attr->orig_dev))
>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> +
>>> + ret = dsa_port_set_mst_state(dp, &attr->u.mst_state);
>>> + break;
>>> case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING:
>>> if (!dsa_port_offloads_bridge_dev(dp, attr->orig_dev))
>>> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists