lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 16 Mar 2022 23:08:32 +0900
From:   Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
To:     David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>
Cc:     Vasant Karasulli <vkarasulli@...e.de>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
        Kohada.Tetsuhiro@...mitsubishielectric.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] exfat: add keep_last_dots mount option

2022-03-16 22:57 GMT+09:00, David Disseldorp <ddiss@...e.de>:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:20:28 +0100, Vasant Karasulli wrote:
>
>> On So 13-03-22 09:01:32, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> > 2022-03-11 20:47 GMT+09:00, Vasant Karasulli <vkarasulli@...e.de>:
>> > > The "keep_last_dots" mount option will, in a
>> > > subsequent commit, control whether or not trailing periods '.' are
>> > > stripped
>> > > from path components during file lookup or file creation.
>> > I don't know why the 1/2 patch should be split from the 2/2 patch.
>> > Wouldn't it be better to combine them? Otherwise it looks good to me.
>>
>> I just followed the same patch structure as was in the initial version
>> of the patch.
>
> I'm fine with having both patches squashed together. @Namjae: should we
> resubmit as a single patch or can you do the squash on your side before
> submitting to Linus?
I would be grateful if you resubmit it to the list after making it one:)

Thanks!
>
> Cheers, David
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ