[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa3ffe77-8066-adab-80f0-27568ad8f2f6@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 08:34:04 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: system locks up with CONFIG_SLS=Y; 5.17.0-rc
On 3/16/22 02:51, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> I've been (somewhat unsuccessfully) trying to bisect a hard lock-up
> of my workstation that occurs when I'm running 5.17 rc kernels a few
> seconds after I start a kvm guest instance. There is no output to
> any log, everything locks up completely, sysrq doesn't even work
> anymore. As bisection progressed closer and closer to the branch
> where straight-line-speculation mitigation was enabled, and as bisect
> landing me between 9cdbeec40968 ("x86/entry_32: Fix segment exceptions")
> and 3411506550b1 ("x86/csum: Rewrite/optimize csum_partial()") wasn't
> resulting in clear results (my system definately starts Oopsing and
> gets so hosed up that I'm forced to reboot, but it isn't quite as dire
> as sysrq continues to function) I decided to just try a build with
> CONFIG_SLS disabled, and it turns out that works just fine. Sooo...
>
> This system uses a Intel Core2 Duo E8400 processor.
> working config (CONFIG_SLS=N) and dmesg at:
> http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/k/sls.config-5.17.0-rc8
> http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/k/sls.dmesg
>
> (I don't think the dmesg of CONFIG_SLS=Y is really any different.)
If you get really ambitious, you could try to see if any of the
individual things that change based on the CONFIG_SLS #ifdef trigger
this. Basically, turn off the config option and then go manually
enabling each of the sites.
The odd thing is that it isn't touching anything really KVM-specific.
It probably influences some KVM-specific assembly, but it's hard to see
how that might break anything.
The worrying part is:
ifdef CONFIG_SLS
KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mharden-sls=all
endif
That's presumably a shiny, new compiler option, also known as a
relatively lightly tested compiler option.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists